Hukseflux HFS-5 Unreliable Heat Flux Measurement User Manual
- June 1, 2024
- Hukseflux
Table of Contents
- Instruction For Use
- Omega manufacturing technology
- Test results: stability
- Bending test on YouTube
- Sensitivity as a function of environment
- Test results
- Conclusions
- Other Omega models
- More details about the tests
- About Hukseflux
- Customer Support
- References
- Read User Manual Online (PDF format)
- Download This Manual (PDF format)
Hukseflux HFS-5 Unreliable Heat Flux Measurement
Instruction For Use
For an accurate heat flux measurement, users may reasonably assume that
- sensitivity does not change over time; stability
- sensitivity as specified on the calibration certificate can be relied upon; that it does not depend on the environment of the sensor
Testing at Hukseflux reveals that Omega heat flux sensors of model HFS-5 do not perform reliably within their rated operating conditions: they are not stable, and their sensitivity depends on the environment. This leads to a much larger measurement uncertainty than the 5 % stated on the HFS-5 calibration certificate.
Omega manufacturing technology
Omega manufacturing technology is based on the use of metal-filled
electrically conducting inks.
See also US patent 10393598.
Hukseflux carried out testing* of model HFS-5.
Figure 1 Close-up of an Omega HFS-5 heat flux sensor.
The thermopile is made using printing technology. Two different metal-filled
electrically conducting inks are printed into through-holes.
- Experiments were carried out on Hukseflux FHF05-series sensors, as well as HFS-5 sensors purchased from Omega. The test results may not be applicable to sensors produced by other manufacturers or when improving manufacturing technology.
Figure 2 General heat flux sensor principle: the sensor contains a thermopile consisting of an alternating pattern of two metal alloys.
Test results: stability
The sensitivities of the sensors were tested for
- stability under bending
- stability at high temperatures
Sensors of Omega and Hukseflux are all rated for long-term use up to 120 °C
and sold as “flexible”.
Omega data sheet “UHF-HFS-Series _spec” accessed on website FEB 10, 2023: “The
heat flux sensor is flexible enough to be easily attached to round surfaces”.
Changes in sensitivity and electrical resistance are all relative to the
sensitivity and resistance at the start of the test; positive values indicate
a higher value after testing.
Testing was performed at 20 °C after bending once around a pipe of 25 x 10-3 m
radius and after 24 hours of exposure to high temperatures.
Sensors were exposed to 120 °C. The changes of sensitivity were all relative
to an initial measurement by Hukseflux at 20 °C and were all performed on a
flat surface. When determining the sensitivity, the capability to measure
changes has a reproducibility in the order of 1 %, asserting that changes of 3
% can meaningfully be detected. In this experiment, the absolute accuracy is
not a factor.
sensor technology| test| permanent change of sensitivity| permanent change of
resistance
---|---|---|---
| [name]| [(V/(W/m2 )/(V/(W/m2 )]| [Ω / Ω]
Hukseflux etched| bending radius 25 x 10-3 m| not detectable (< 3 %)| < 2 %
Omega printed| bending radius 25 x 10-3 m| -7 %| +11 %
Hukseflux etched| 120 °C| not detectable (< 3 %)| < 2 %
Omega printed| 120 °C| + 10 % to -12 %| + 77 % to 223 %
Table 1 Stability testing: tests were performed before and after 24-hour exposure to high temperature.
Bending test on YouTube
Interested to see the kind of experiment we perform? See a movie on the bending test on YouTube. At 02:00 min in the video “Improved technology for heat flux sensors”, you can witness the testing.
Sensitivity as a function of environment
A heat flux sensor is supposed to keep its sensitivity regardless of the
environment.
The sensitivity of Omega HFS-5 sensors, however, depends on the material on
which it is mounted. The sensitivity of Hukseflux sensors remains the same in
all environments.
Thermal conductivity dependence is an intrinsic property of a heat flux
sensor; its sensitivity depends on the thermal conductivity of the surrounding
material. This is expressed as a % change of sensitivity, either absolute or
per [W/(m·K)] change of thermal conductivity.
Thermal conductivity dependence is reported relative to the sensitivity at the calibration reference condition mounted on a metal heat sink. There are no standardised experiments to perform tests. The results presented are, therefore, “comparative” only.
Test results
The sensitivities of the sensors were tested under various conditions. The reference condition is mounted on aluminium, the other conditions are surrounded by Pyrex (glass) and silicone (plastic) to create an environment with different thermal conductivities.
Conclusions
-
heat flux measurements with the Omega HFS-5 sensors are unreliable. The sensor is not stable, under normal rated operating conditions. Depending on the thermal conductivity of the environment, the measurement is also subject to other large systematic errors. The manufacturer does not inform the user about these aspects of the sensor performance.
-
the risk that the sensitivity of an HFS-5 sensor instantly and significantly changes is very high, especially when bending the sensor (at installation) or when using it at high temperatures. Very mild, short term exposure testing – all within rated conditions of use advertised by Omega – already leads to changes of sensitivity in the order of 7 %. (see Table 1). Hukseflux sensors are perfectly stable under the same conditions.
-
the Omega company accepts this instability. Comment by email to Hukseflux on JUL 30, 2023 is “For customers with extreme applications (i.e., running at max temperature) they may see initial sensitivity drift but Omega is more than happy to recalibrate these sensors after initial breakin.”
-
the HFS-5 sensitivity depends on the sensor environment; this dependence is in the ± 10 % range and is significantly larger than the calibration uncertainty of 5 %**. Hukseflux sensors show deviations in the order of only ± 2 % under the same conditions.
-
users must take the risk of instability and thermal conductivity dependence into account in their uncertainty evaluations. Hukseflux sensors do not suffer from similar instability or thermal conductivity dependence. Measurements with Omega HFS-5 sensors, therefore, tend to be less accurate than those with Hukseflux sensors under the same conditions.
-
source: text and brochures on Omega website 04 FEB 2023, “temperature range -50 to 120 °C,
**source: HFS-5 calibration certificate 15304, supplied in 2020
Figure 3 A : sensor without a spreader such as Omega model HFS-5. One thermopile alloy (1), other thermopile alloy (2) In B and C, the thermopile is covered by spreaders. B: sensor with a single large spreader (3) C: sensor with multiple small spreaders (4) such as the FHF05-series sensors made by Hukseflux.
Figure 4 Thermal conductivity dependence of three sensor types. Two “type A” sensors were tested: one Omega with a thermopile made of electrically conductive inks and the other made of semiconductors. The calibration uncertainty is 5 %. The Omega HFS-5 makes up to 10 % error when the thermal conductivity of the environment changes. Errors made with type B and C – Hukseflux FHF05-series sensors – are negligible.
Other Omega models
Omega model HFS-6 is a sensor sandwiched between two metal foils.
Why is this done? Text from the Omega website JAN 31, 2023:
“Metal encapsulation increases the robustness of the sensor itself for
repeated applications of the sensor to measurement surfaces.”
This may be beneficial to stability when bending.
Metal foils may make it impossible to bend the sensor at all. The foil may
also absorb part of the force and also reduce the influence of the environment
on sensitivity (thermal conductivity dependence). However, the stability at
higher temperatures will not improve.
Older and discontinued Omega heat flux sensor models such as Omega HFS-3 have
a fundamentally different manufacturing process. Hukseflux did not test model
HFS-3, but expect a much better stability.
More details about the tests
Hukseflux has published two detailed notes about the experiments. In these notes, the Omega brand and model HFS-5 model name are not specifically mentioned:
- heat flux sensor technology: why use sensors with spreaders
- heat flux sensor technology: printed thermopile conductors vs. etched-and-plated
Figure 5 Example of Hukseflux model FHF05-50X50 heat flux sensor. This model is stable under bending and high-temperature exposure.
About Hukseflux
Hukseflux is the leading expert in measurement of energy transfer. We design
and manufacture sensors and measuring systems that support the energy
transition. We are market leaders in solar radiation- and heat flux
measurement.
Customers are served through the main office in the Netherlands, and locally
owned representative sales offices in the USA, Brazil, India, China, Southeast
Asia and Japan.
Customer Support
Would you like more information?
E-mail us at: info@hukseflux.com
Copyright by Hukseflux. Version 2408. We reserve the right to change specifications without prior notice Page 4/4. For Hukseflux Thermal Sensors go to www.hukseflux.com or e-mail us: info@hukseflux.com
References
Read User Manual Online (PDF format)
Read User Manual Online (PDF format) >>