Lafayette Instrument 32023 Minnesota Dexterity Test Instruction Manual

August 9, 2024
Lafayette Instrument

Lafayette Instrument 32023 Minnesota Dexterity Test

Product Information

Specifications

  • Product Name: The Minnesota Dexterity Test
  • Model Number: 32023
  • Manufacturer: Lafayette Instrument
  • Address: 3700 Sagamore Parkway North Lafayette, IN 47904 USA
  • Contact: Tel: 765-423-1505, Email: info@lafayetteinstrument.com

Product Usage Instructions

Introduction

The Minnesota Dexterity Test (MMDT) measures simple but rapid eye-hand coordination and arm-hand dexterity, focusing on gross motor skills. It is commonly used in physical therapy, occupational therapy, vocational evaluation, and pre-employment screening.

Administration

The MMDT includes instructions for two test batteries: Placing Test and Turning Test. These test batteries are administered separately in a step-by- step format. Directions to the subject are presented in bold italics and framed in quotation marks.

Timing

Ensure timing is consistent during the administration of each test battery to maintain accuracy and fairness in assessment.

Test Batteries

  • Placing Test: This test assesses the subject’s ability in placing objects accurately within a specified area.
  • Turning Test: This test evaluates the subject’s ability in turning objects with precision.

Supplies Needed

Ensure you have all necessary supplies ready before administering the test, including the test kit, scoring sheets, and any additional equipment required for the specific test battery.

Test Procedures

  • General Instruction: Follow the step-by-step instructions provided in the manual for each test battery. Ensure clear communication with the subject throughout the testing process.
  • Special Group Instructions: Adapt the testing procedures as needed for group testing situations to ensure consistency and fairness.

Scoring and Interpretation of Data

Use the provided guidelines to score the subject’s performance accurately. Interpret the data based on the specified criteria to assess the subject’s motor skills effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the purpose of the Minnesota Dexterity Test?
    The test is designed to measure eye-hand coordination, arm-hand dexterity, and gross motor skills in subjects for various applications such as rehabilitation, vocational evaluation, and job placement.

  • How can I obtain replacement parts for the test kit?
    You can refer to the “Replacement Parts and Reordering Information” section in the manual or contact Lafayette Instrument directly for assistance with replacement parts.

Preface

Introduction

The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) is a frequently administered, standardized test for the evaluation of a subject’s ability to move small objects various distances. This manual is a guide demonstrating the proper test procedure for each test battery. The test administrator must read and follow the manual completely to insure that standardization has occurred and that the test results are accurate. Note: Failure to follow the manual may affect the subject’s test scores, making the test invalid.

Theory and Application

The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) is used to measure a subject’s simple but rapid eye-hand coordination as well as arm-hand dexterity. In general, the MMDT measures gross motor skills.
Many approaches have been developed to classify motor skills. Each classification system is based on the general nature of the motor skills relating to some specific aspect of the skills. Magill considers three systems, in which motor skill classification is based:

  1. The precision of the movement
  2. Defining the beginning and end points of the movement
  3. The stability of the environment

The MMDT incorporates all three of these systems

  • The MMDT can be used for many testing applications. Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, vocational evaluation, and pre-employment screening are four generalized uses of the MMDT. Other applications for the MMDT can be found by
    doing a bibliography search.

  • Physical and Occupational Therapists use the MMDT for injury rehabilitation. The MMDT is a tool used to obtain baseline data on a patient. This test can also be used to document patient progress and/or degree of disability.

  • Vocational evaluators use the MMDT to determine a subject’s ability and aptitude for certain work-related applications and for recommending job placement that requires manual dexterity. The MMDT is also used to develop a specific training program that will give an individual the skills to complete a job task that requires manual dexterity.

  • Human Resource Directors and Temporary Staffing Agencies use the MMDT as a pre-employment screening and selection tool. An applicant’s performance on the MMDT can indicate their ability to perform in a job/task that requires manual dexterity. Note:

  • It is strongly recommended that the testing organization show a correlation between a subject’s performance on the MMDT and a subject’s performance in the specific job task. This may be accomplished by testing subjects currently working in a specific job task who are high performers and low performers. Then test the same subjects using the MMDT. The high performer should score higher on the MMDT than the low performers.

Administration

  • Before administering the MMDT, the test administrator is advised to carefully read this section of the manual. As with any standardized test, it is important to follow the directions very closely. If the MMDT is to be used as a basis for employee selection, the test must be administered to all applicants according to the standardized test procedure. If the test is not given identically, irrelevant factors may affect test scores. In order to reduce the variability among test administrators, specific details regarding the arrangement of materials and the testing procedures are presented below.
  • The test administrator is advised to practice the administration of the MMDT before giving it for selection purposes. The amount of practice needed in order to become comfortable with the testing process is dependent upon the test administrator’s previous testing experience. The test administrator should practice the MMDT until he or she is able to perform each of the tests at an above-average speed for demonstration purposes. Note: The test administrator will be demonstrating to the test subject what is expected of him or her before each test.

Timing
When using an ordinary watch or wall clock, it is recommended that the test administrator say the word “READY,” pause, and then say “GO” at the instant that the second hand reaches a landmark point on the clock. For example, the test administrator may want to start on one of the five second marks. Make sure to pick a starting point on the clock that is easy to read. After the test administrator says, “GO,” immediately write down the subject’s starting time in minutes and seconds. As soon as the subject finishes, record the finishing time above the beginning time and calculate the difference by subtracting. This calculated number is the subject’s test score. Note: 2 minutes and 30 seconds = 150 seconds. Scoring is interpreted by total seconds for any given number of trials.

Test Batteries
The MMDT includes instructions for 2 test batteries:

  1. Placing Test
  2. Turning Test

The Placing Test and the Turning Test are commonly administered test batteries. Each test battery is listed in the next section separately. The directions are presented in a step-by-step format. All directions the test administrator reads to the subject are printed in BOLD Italics and are framed in “quotation marks”. Make sure to read through the directions to ensure that they are clearly stated to the test subject.
Remember: Ask the test subject if they have any questions about the test.

Practice
One trial should always be given for practice.
Note : The test administrator should demonstrate the test to the subject before starting the practice trial. Four test trials in addition to the practice trial are highly recommended. The fewer trials administered, the less test score reliability. For individual testing, norms are provided for interpreting a total score based on two, three or fourtest trials. Group testing norms are based on three and four test trials only.

Group Testing

If the MMDT is to be administered to a group, the test administrator should demonstrate the test on a separate board located in front of the subjects as he or she reads the directions to the group. Figure 1 on page 3 illustrates one arrangement that permits the
test administrator to oversee the testing of many subjects during group testing.
Tip : GROUP TESTING promotes competition among peers, which is good when testing a subject’s ability to manipulate objects as quickly as possible. However, an individual CAN do just as well when tested individually, but he must be appropriately motivated. Motivation given by the test administrator is encouraged and necessary. Without appropriate motivation, the subject is apt to loaf along and thus not earn a score that demonstrates the subject’s true potential. Overall, there is greater reliability in a group testing situation, even if only two subjects are in the group.

Figure 1: This picture shows an example of an optimal group testing arrangement. Note: The test administrator should be able to observe all test subjects.
Special Group Instructions are available on page 6.

Supplies Needed
You will need the following supplies or items in order for the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) to be a consistent, standardized test:

  1. Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test
    Model 32023

  2. Instruction Manual

  3. 1 test board

  4. 60 black and red plastic disks

  5. Tablet of score sheets.

  6. Testing table that should be between 28 and 32 inches in height. Note: The subject will stand at the table throughout the administration of the MMDT.

  7. Stopwatch or clock that reads in seconds. A stopwatch or interval timer is highly recommended, especially for group testing. Tip: When you are using an ordinary watch or wall clock, please read the paragraph in the ADMINSTRATION section of the manual that offers further instructions concerning start and stop times.

Test Procedures

General Instruction

The test administrator should have the MMDT in the starting position on the table before the arrival of the subject. Note: All subjects must stand during the duration of the test trials. The score sheet should be placed on the table directly in front of the test subject. When the subject(s) arrives and is standing comfortably in front of the table, say:
“You must enter your name, the date, and your dominant hand in the spaces provided on the score sheet. Today’s date is _____. Do not fill out any other part of the form.”

Give an overview of the MMDT by saying:

  • “The series of tests that you are going to take will measure your eye-hand-finger coordination and gross motor skills. The tests are timed, so you must complete each as quickly as you can.”

Now administer the first test to be given in the series.

Special Group Instructions
If the test administrator determines that the subjects should enter their own times on the score sheet, then the following directions must be read to the group:

“On the score sheet, there are some spaces you will use to write in the time it takes you to complete each test. Notice that there are 5 sections and that the sections have boxes that say “Practice Trial,” “Trial 1,” “Trial 2,” “Trial 3,” and “Trial 4.” As you are finishing each test, I will be counting the seconds aloud like this: 55, 56, 57, 58, and so on. I want you to write down the number of seconds that you hear me say just as you finish each trial. I will tell you where to write the number before you begin each trial. Now, put the pencil and score sheet to one side making sure that it is out of your way.”

Tip : As the first subject is near the end of the practice trial, you should read the number of seconds aloud as an example to the subjects of what they should expect to hear. For every trial during each test, you must show the group where they should enter their times in seconds onto the score sheet.

Placing Test

Starting Position: Put the board on the table about 10 inches from the edge. Insert the disks into the holes in the board. Lift the board UP, allowing the disks to fall through the holes and remain in straight rows and columns on the table. Now place the board directly in front of the disks. Note: If the disks moved out of place, manually realign the disks. The board should now be about 1 inch from the edge of the table closest to the subject. This is the starting position for the placing test. Figure 2 illustrates this position.

Figure 2 Starting position for the Placing Test. Begin by saying and demonstrating:

“The object of this test is to see how fast you can put the disks into the holes of the board using only one hand. You will want to use your dominant hand.”

  • Demonstrate as you read the following instructions. Note: If you are facing the subject across the board, remember to demonstrate on your LEFT because the instructions pertain to the subject’s RIGHT. Also remember that TOP to the subject is BOTTOM to you. You should start your demonstration slowly and increase speed as you speak.
    “You must begin on your RIGHT. Pick up the bottom disk and insert it into the top hole of the board. Now, you must pick up the next disk in the column on the right, and so on. You will move from right to left on this test. Once you complete one column, repeat the previous sequence in the second column until you have filled the entire board.”

  • Continue demonstrating until two columns have been filled. Now, remove the eight disks from the board and put them back into place above the board. Note: You may have to use a ruler or an object with a straight edge to align the disks properly.
    “You may hold the board with your free hand if you wish to do so. Do you remember the order in which you pick up the disks and place them down?”

  • If the instructions must be repeated, point to the disks in the order that they should be picked up and then point to the disks in the order that they should be placed into the holes in the board.
    “You must make sure that all of the disks are fully inserted into the holes of the board before the trial is complete. If you dropped a disk, you must pick it up and insert it into the proper hole before the time is stopped. Your score will be the total number of seconds it takes to complete several trials. We will record the time for each trial separately. When you finish one trial, we must rearrange the board and disks into the starting position before starting another trial. Please do not touch the disks until you hear further instruction.”

  • Start the stopwatch or log the time as soon as you say the word, “GO.” During the practice trial, you can provide assistance to the subject if necessary.

  • You will now begin the first trial by saying:
    “Put your hand on the first disk. READY, GO!”

  • When the subject is finished with the trial, log the time in seconds in the space provided on the score sheet. Now, you must move the board (now filled with disks) to the top. Lift the board UP, allowing the disks to fall through the holes. Now place the board directly in front of the disks. Remember: The board should be about on 1 inch from the edge of the table. The board should now be in the starting position for the next trial of the Placing Test. You can begin the next trial by saying:
    “Put your hand on the first disk. READY, GO!”

  • Repeat the above procedure until all of the desired trials are completed. You should encourage the subject between every trial by stating the appropriate sentence:
    “Remember, you are being timed, so complete each trial as quickly as possible.”
    OR,
    “You did a good job, but I believe that you can complete the next trial faster.”

  • And on the last trial,
    “This is the last trial and should be your best time.”

  • At the end of the last trial, you will say:
    “That’s all for this test.”
    If you are going to give another test, you should let your subject know that he or she will be taking a different test now. At the completion of the Placing Test, the board and disks should be in the correct starting position for the Turning Test .

Turning Test

Starting Position: Put the board on the table about 1 inch from the edge closest to the subject. Insert all of the disks into the holes in the board with either the RED or BLACK side facing UP (the color must be consistent on the whole board). You should now be in the starting position for the Turning Test, which is illustrated below in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Starting position and sequence of rows with directions of travel for the Turning Test.

Begin by saying:

  • “The object of this test is to see how fast you can pick up the disks with one hand, turn them with the other hand, and replace the disks back into the holes on the board.”

    • You should start your demonstration slowly and increase speed as you speak. Figure 3 illustrates the sequence of rows and the direction of travel in the Turning Test. Note: If you are facing the subject across the board, remember to demonstrate on your LEFT because the instructions pertain to the subject’s RIGHT. Also remember that TOP to the subject is BOTTOM to you. Demonstrate as you read the following instructions.
  • “With your LEFT hand, pick up the block from the upper right-hand corner. Turn the disk while passing it to your RIGHT hand and return it into the original hole in the board with the BOTTOM side facing UP. You must work to your LEFT across the board on the top row.”

    • Continue to demonstrate until you complete the entire TOP row. As you start to demonstrate the second row, say:
  • “Now with your RIGHT hand, pick up the first block in the second row. Turn the disk while passing it to your LEFT hand and return it into the original hole with the BOTTOM side facing UP. You will work to your RIGHT until you complete the entire row.”

    • The subject always picks UP the blocks with the hand that LEADS and put them DOWN with the hand that FOLLOWS. Continue demonstrating the test in its entirety.
  • “As you work back to the LEFT in the third row, you will use your LEFT hand to pick up the disk and your RIGHT hand to return it back to the original hole. Working back to your RIGHT on the fourth row, you must use your RIGHT hand to pick up the disk and your LEFT hand to return it.”

    • You should finish the test at a moderate speed. All of the disks must be turned so the same color is facing UP. The board should now be in the original starting position.
  • “You must make sure that all of the disks are fully inserted into the holes of the board before the trial is complete. If you dropped a disk, you must pick it up and insert it into the proper hole before the time is stopped. Your score will be the total number of seconds it takes to complete several trials. We will record the time for each trial separately. When you finish one trial, the board and disks should already be in the starting position for another trial. In other words, the opposite color on the disks is now exposed. Please do not touch the disks until you hear further instructions.”

    • Start the stopwatch or note the time as soon as you say the word, “GO.” During the practice trial, you can provide assistance to the subject if necessary. You will now begin the first trial by saying:
  • “Put your LEFT hand on the disk in the top righthand corner of the board. READY, GO!”

    • When the subject is finished with the trial, log the time in seconds in the space provided on the score sheet. Remember: The board should be about 1 inch from the edge of the table. You can begin the next trial by saying:
  • “Put your LEFT hand on the disk in the top righthand corner. READY, GO!”
    Repeat the above procedure until all of the desired trials are completed. You should encourage the subject between every trial by stating the appropriate sentence:

  • “Remember, you are being timed, so complete each trial as quickly as possible.”
    Or,

  • “You did a good job, but I believe that you can complete the next trial faster.”
    And on the last trial,

  • “This is the last trial and should be your best time.”
    At the end of the last trial, you will say:

  • “That’s all for this test.”
    You have now completed the last test battery of the MMDT.

Scoring and Interpretation of Data

Scoring
The score on any test of the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) is the total seconds required to complete the chosen number of test trials. Two, three or four test trials may have been administered. The practice trial time is not included in the total score.

Composite and comparative scores

  • When the scores of an individual on two or more different tests are to be combined into a composite (sum or average) score, raw scores must first be given a scale value. This can be done by reference to one of the scales at the left side of the chart in Appendix A or B. This must also be done when the difference in score on two tests is to be interpreted, i.e., when one wishes to judge whether an examinee made a better score on one test than on another. This is a major function of the norm charts, for the relative value of scale scores shows visually which are the better and poorer test scores for a subject. The primary function of the norm chart is to assist users in dealing graphically with the scores of an individual as sums, differences and averages. The charts are not designed to furnish a final basis for establishing critical scores.

Interpretation

  • The interpretation of MMDT scores is most appropriately based upon results from prior use of the test in specific selection applications. As pointed out in a previous section, Human Resources Personnel usually wish to classify job applicants into categories. The question then arises: How high or how low must a subject score be to place in one category rather than another? The answer to this question establishes a critical score. For example, an employer may decide that he will employ for certain types of jobs, applicants who score at or above the 75th percentile point and that he will not employ applicants who score below this. He has, by this decision, set the 75th percentile point as the critical score.
    How such a decision was reached is an important matter, but the norms presented in Appendices A and B constitute an insufficient basis for such action. If applicants are plentiful, an employer can, of course, arrange them in such an order that the one scoring highest is at the top, the one scoring lowest is at the bottom and the others range between these two extremes. He then can fill his vacancies from the top of such a list–unless it should turn out that the most successful employees lie somewhere between two critical scores, or that they possess a certain pattern of abilities. Such is often the case.

  • Critical scores can be established systematically and accurately. A good procedure for doing this is to test all applicants routinely and then provide for a follow-up study. From the follow-up study, certain employees eventually can be classified into two categories–satisfactory and unsatisfactory, based upon actual performance on the job. Study of the test scores made by these two contrasting criterion groups will indicate which tests may justifiably be used and what critical scores make possible the most accurate prediction. Personnel selection then is established on a sound and practical basis.

Technical Data

Frequency Distributions
The nature of the frequency distributions that may be expected by administering the MMDT to a cross-sectional population-sample is illustrated by Figures 4 and 5. These distributions were accumulated by administering the tests to employed and unemployed persons. The tests were administered as group tests. The norms presented in Appendix A for group testing are derived from these distributions.

Reliability
Jurgensen determined reliability on four tests of the MMDT by correlating time on first and second trials and correcting with the Spearman–Brown formula. These results are presented in Table 1. Table 1 also includes estimates of the reliability of two-trial and four-trial tests based on Jurgensen’s data.

Validity
A report by Jurgensen concerns the use of the MMDT in a corporation that manufactures pulp, paper and paper specialties. The group tested was composed of men hired as converting machine operators in the paper mill. The work required occasional machine adjustments, but consisted chiefly in removing a specified number of tissue paper sheets from the machine, raising the top sheet to insert advertising material, and placing the package of sheets on a conveyer. All were right-handed, high school graduates, aged 18 to 31 years. Three supervisors independently rated each worker on a scale of 5. Ratings were converted to T-scores, and the sum of the three T-scores was used as the criterion of success. The reliability of the criterion measure, estimated by the Spearman–Brown formula, was 0.75. The four tests administered were the Placing Test, the Turning Test, the One-Hand Turning and Placing Test and the Two-Hand Turning and Placing Test. Two trials were administered for each test.
Table 2 presents the correlations between the four MMDT tests and the success criterion. In addition to Jurgensen’s data, Table 2 includes validity coefficients corrected for attenuation. Using the correlation coefficients in Table 2, a multiple R of 0.61 between two of the tests (Turning and One-Hand Turning and Placing) and the criterion was obtained.

Intercorrelations
The intercorrelations among four of the tests are reported in Table 3.

Correlation with Another Motor Skill Test
Table 4 reports correlations that have been obtained between two tests of the MMDT and the Pennsylvania Bi-Manual Worksample.

Table 1: Reliability of the CMDT (n=212)

Test Two-Trial Reliability Four-Trial Reliability
Placing 0.87 0.93
Turning 0.91 0.95
One-Hand Turning and Placing 0.95 0.98
Two-Hand Turning and Placing 0.94 0.97

Table 2: Validity Coefficients (n=60)

Validity

__

Test

| __

Mean

| Standard Deviation| __

Gross

| Corrected for Attenuation
Placing| 123.2| 10.1| 0.32| .40
Turning| 98.9| 9.3| 0.46| 0.55
One-Hand Turning and Placing| 152.6| 15.7| 0.57| 0.67
Two-Hand Turning and Placing| 86.9| 9.4| 0.33| 0.39

Table 3: Intercorrelations Among Four Tests

__

Test

| __

Placing

| __

Turning

| One-Hand Turning and

Placing

| Two-Hand Turning and

Placing

---|---|---|---|---
Placing| 1.00| .52| .53| .46
Turning|  | 1.00| .46| .55
One-Hand Turning and Placing|  |  | 1.00| .64
Two-Hand Turning and Placing|  |  |  | 1.00

Table 4: Correlation Between the CMDT and the Pennsylvania Bi- Manual Worksample

MRMT| Pennsylvania Bi-Manual Worksample| n| r
---|---|---|---
Placing| Assembly| 477| .46
Turning| Assembly| 473| .40

Group and Individual Norms Based on Older Adult Unemployed
The norms and information presented in Appendix A are taken from the manual for the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation. These norms are based on the distribution of scores obtained from 3,000 cases tested by the Employment Stabilization Research Institute at the University of Minnesota. The sample was comprised largely of adult, older, unemployed people.
The unique feature of the norm chart is the use of several equated scales, so for interpretation purposes, conversion from one to the other is automatic. They are equated on the assumption of a normal distribution.

Types of Interpretation Scales
Four scales are aligned on the left of the chart:

  1. Percentile scale
  2. Standard scale
  3. Stanine scale
  4. Verbal scale

The percentile scale is used when a score on a test is interpreted in terms of percent of the normative population surpassed by a subject making a particular score. The midpoint 50 on the scale is the median, representing that the score made by a subject was better than 50 percent of the normative population. In other words, percentile point 25 represents that a subject performed better than 25 percent of the normative population. Other percentile points are interpreted similarly.
The standard scale is a statistical analysis of a subject’s score. It is derived from the normal frequency curve. This curve is bell-shaped and not rectangular like the frequency curve from which the percentile scale is derived. Standard score 50, representing the mean (arithmetic average), is equated to percentile point 50. Similarly standard scores 45 and 55 are equated to percentile points 31 and 69 respectively. These points represent the maximum and minimum scores made by the middle 38 percent of the normative population. The difference between these two scores approximates the standard deviation (SD) to equal 10, on the standard scale. Furthermore, a standard score of 60 is a score one standard deviation above the mean, and a standard score of 30 is a score two standard deviations below the mean, if the distribution is normal.
The stanine scale is simply the standard scale divided into nine categories. It is useful when punching data into a card to be processed by an automatic sorting machine. Each category in the stanine scale, except the first and the ninth, is bounded by 5-point intervals on the standard scale.
The verbal scale is merely a scale of broad categories. Thus, a subject described as having very high ability would be an individual whose measured ability score falls above 1½ standard deviation (SD) from the mean. A high- ability subject’s score will fall within a range of one SD from the mean. A subject described as having average ability would be an individual whose measured ability score falls within the range of ½ SD above and below the mean. A low-ability subject would fall within the range of one SD below the mean. A subject with very low ability would be an individual whose score falls under 1½ SD below the mean.

Norms
In the MMDT Interpretation Chart, the first two columns of norms are used to interpret scores made when the Placing and Turning tests are administered as group tests, and when an examinee is given four trials. All other entries constitute norms for tests administered as individual tests. Separate norms are given for use when the examinee is administering four trials, three trials and two trials. Norms were derived from data furnished by: W. A. Ziegler, Clifford E. Jurgensen, Lindsey R. Harmon, John R. Roberts, and Mary Bauman.

Group Placing Test and Turning Test Norms for Young Adults
These norm tables are based on a sample of young people who were employed or seeking employment. The norms were established by 11,000 new cases tested. Scores of the 11,000 new cases, made up largely of younger people in their early employment careers, were collected. In one group, made up of 6,000 Minneapolis Public Library patrons, the median age was 19 years.

Placing Test

 | Percentile Rank| Seconds for Three Trials| Standard Score
---|---|---|---
Very High| 100|  |
 | 90| 138| 6.28
High| 80| 144| 5.84
 | 70| 148| 5.53
Average| 60| 152| 5.25
 | 50| 155| 5.00
 | 40| 159| 4.75
Low| 30| 162| 4.47
 | 20| 167| 4.16
Very Low| 10| 174| 3.72
 | 0|  |

Turning Test

 | Percentile Rank| Seconds for Three Trials| Standard Score
---|---|---|---
Very High| 100|  |
 | 90| 109| 6.28
High| 80| 114| 5.84
 | 70| 118| 5.53
Average| 60| 121| 5.25
 | 50| 124| 5.00
 | 40| 127| 4.75
Low| 30| 131| 4.47
 | 20| 135| 4.16
Very Low| 10| 142| 3.72
 | 0|  |

Instructions for Board Setup
The following are instructions for connecting the 3 parts of the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test Board.

  • Step 1:
    Observe Connection Slots
    At right is a photo of the slotted connection area of the MMDT board.
    Line up the slots with the corresponding connector.
    NOTE : Ensure (on each of the boards) the face with the injection mold markings is facing downward.

  • Step 2:
    Align Slots with Connectors
    Place the connectors of one board over the corresponding slots of the other as shown in the photo at right.

  • Step 3:
    Push Down Connectors
    Lightly push down each connector with your fingers until it is flush. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for the final board.

References

  • American Guidance Service (1969). Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test: Examiner’s Manual. Circle Pines, Minn.
  • Jurgensen, C. E. (1943). Extension of the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 164-169.
  • Magill, R. A. (1989). Motor Learning Concepts and Applications. Iowa: William C. Brown Publishers.
  • Roberts, J. R. (1945). Pennsylvania Bi-Manual Worksample: Examiner’s Manual. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

Replacement Parts and Reordering Information
We at Lafayette Instrument Company continue our service after the sale by offering the following replacement parts for the MMDT:

  • Disks……………………..# 32031
  • Board…………………….# 1-04811
  • Manual……………………# MAN185
  • Score Sheets………………# 32032

We can be contacted from 8:00am -5:00pm Monday through Friday for pricing and ordering.

Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test Score Sheet Model 32023

Quick Reference Averages (50 Percentile) in Seconds Based on Number of Trials

 | Individual Placing Test| Individual Turning Test| Group Placing Test| Group Turning Test
---|---|---|---|---
Two Trials| 123| 99| Not Applicable| Not Applicable
Three Trials
^| 183| 146| 155| 124
Four **Trials***| 242| 192| 236| 195

  • Data taken from the INTERPRETATION CHART
  • Data found in APPENDEX B for Group Testing averages based on three trials.

Subject Record

  • Name: ____
  • Dominate Hand: Right / Left
  • Reason for Administrating:
  • Test Administrator Name: _____
  • Test Date: //____
  • Test Setting: Group / Individual

Scoring Grid Based on Number of Seconds

 | Practice Trial| Trial One| Trial Two| Trial Three| Trial Four| Total Seconds| Score A**| Score B**
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Placing Test|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Turning Test|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

Refer to the INTERPRETATION CHART and choose from the various SCALES. You can use the Verbal Scale, Stanine Scale, Standard Scale, or Percentile Scale. The Verbal Scale and Percentile Scale are the most commonly used.

Terms and Condition

Worldwide Headquarters
Lafayette Instrument Company
3700 Sagamore Parkway North
Lafayette, IN 47904, USA
Tel: 765-423-1505
Fax: 765-423-4111
sales@lafayetteinstrument.com

European Office
Tel: +44 1509 817700
Fax: +44 1509 817701
sales@campdeninstruments.com

Placing an Order
All orders need to be accompanied by a copy of your purchase order. All orders must include the following information:

  • Quantity
  • Part Number
  • Description
  • Purchase order number or method of pre-payment
  • Tax status (include tax-exempt numbers)
  • Shipping address for this order
  • Billing address for the invoice we’ll mail when this order is shipped
  • Telephone number
  • Email address
  • Signature and typed name of person authorized to order these products

Exchanges and Refunds
No item may be returned without prior authorization from Lafayette Instrument Company and a Return Materials Authorization (RMA#) number which must be affixed to the shipping label of the returned goods. The merchandise should be packed well and insured for the full value. Unopened merchandise may be returned prepaid within thirty (30) days after receipt of the item and in the original shipping carton. Collect shipments will not be accepted. Product must be returned in saleable condition, and credit is subject to inspection of the merchandise.

Repairs
Instrumentation may not be returned without first receiving a Return Materials Authorization Number (RMA). When returning instrumentation for service, please contact Lafayette Instrument to receive an RMA number. Your RMA number will be good for 30 days. Address the shipment to:
Lafayette Instrument Company
RMA# XXXX
3700 Sagamore Parkway North
Lafayette, IN 47904, USA.
Shipments cannot be received at the PO Box. All items should be packed well and insured for full value. An estimate of repair will be given prior to completion. We must receive a copy of your purchase order via email before non-warranty repair work can commence.

Damaged Goods
Damaged instrumentation should not be returned to Lafayette Instrument prior to a thorough inspection. If a shipment arrives damaged, note damage on delivery bill and have the driver sign it to acknowledge the damage. Contact the delivery service, and they will file an insurance claim. If damage is not detected at the time of delivery, contact the carrier/shipper and request an inspection within 10 days of the original delivery. Please contact the Lafayette Instrument Customer Service Department for repair or replacement of the damaged merchandise.

Limited Warranty

Lafayette Instrument Company warrants equipment to be free of defects in material and workmanship for a period of one year from the date of shipment, except as provided hereinafter. This assumes normal usage under commonly accepted operating parameters and excludes consumable products.

Warranty period for repairs or used instrumentation purchased from Lafayette Instrument is 90 days. Lafayette Instrument Company agrees either to repair or replace, at its sole option and free of part charges to the customer, instrumentation which, under proper and normal conditions of use, proves to be defective within the warranty period. Warranty for any parts of such repaired or replaced instrumentation shall be covered under the same limited warranty and shall have a warranty period of 90 days from the date of shipment or the remainder of the original warranty period whichever is greater. This warranty and remedy are given expressly and instead of all other warranties, expressed or implied, of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose and constitutes the only warranty made by Lafayette Instrument Company.
Lafayette Instrument Company neither assumes nor authorizes any person to assume for it any other liability in connection with the sale, installation, service or use of its instrumentation. Lafayette Instrument Company shall have no liability whatsoever for special, consequential, or punitive damages of any kind from any cause arising out of the sale, installation, service or use of its instrumentation.
All products manufactured by Lafayette Instrument Company are tested and inspected prior to shipment. Upon prompt notification by the Customer, Lafayette Instrument Company will correct any defect in warranted equipment of its manufacture either, at its option, by return of the item to the factory, or shipment of a repaired or replacement part. Lafayette Instrument Company will not be obliged, however, to replace or repair any piece of equipment, which has been abused, improperly installed, altered, damaged, or repaired by others. Defects in equipment do not include decomposition, wear, or damage by chemical action or corrosion, or damage incurred during shipment.

Limited Obligations Covered by this Warranty

  • Shipping charges under warranty are covered only in one direction. The customer is responsible for shipping charges to the factory if return of the part is required.
  • This warranty does not cover damage to components due to improper installation by the customer.
  • Consumable and or expendable items, including but not limited to electrodes, lights, batteries, fuses, O-rings, gaskets, and tubing, are excluded from warranty.
  • Failure by the customer to perform normal and reasonable maintenance on instruments will void warranty claims.
  • If the original invoice for the instrument is issued to a company that is not the company of the end user, and not an authorized Lafayette Instrument Company distributor, then all warranty requests must be processed through the company that sold the product to the end user, and not directly to Lafayette Instrument Company.

References

Read User Manual Online (PDF format)

Read User Manual Online (PDF format)  >>

Download This Manual (PDF format)

Download this manual  >>

Lafayette Instrument User Manuals

Related Manuals