PHONAK Insight Hearing Aids Instructions
- September 14, 2024
- PHONAK
Table of Contents
- Insight Hearing Aids
- Specifications:
- Product Information:
- Key Highlights:
- Considerations for Practice:
- Introduction:
- Is Roger the same as an FM system?
- Benefits of Roger:
- Barriers to Roger Adoption:
- Step 1: Setting Up the Roger System
- Step 2: Pairing the Transmitter and Receiver
- Step 3: Adjusting Settings
- Step 4: Maintenance
- Q: Is Roger suitable for all types of hearing aids?
- Q: How far can the Roger system transmit audio?
Insight Hearing Aids
“`html
Specifications:
- Product: Phonak Roger
- Model: Insight
- Transmission: 2.4GHz digital modulation (DM) system
- Designed for: Hearing aids and cochlear implants
- Features: Low latency, low power consumption, high-quality
audio, secure tap-proof networks
Product Information:
Phonak Roger is a scientifically validated remote microphone
system designed for the hearing aid industry. It offers solutions
for managing listening situations with high noise levels or when
speech is beyond the critical distance of hearing aids.
Key Highlights:
Roger Unlimited simplifies usability, saves time, and enhances
meaningful connections.
Considerations for Practice:
Roger technology provides benefits beyond speech
intelligibility, including improved noise levels, reduced listening
effort, and enhanced temporal processing.
Introduction:
Roger technology has been a cornerstone in the industry since
2013, offering effective solutions for challenging listening
environments.
Is Roger the same as an FM system?
Roger uses a 2.4GHz digital modulation system and is designed
specifically for hearing aids and cochlear implants, offering
high-quality audio and secure networks.
Benefits of Roger:
Roger systems have been well-cited in scientific literature for
their benefits over traditional FM systems and other DM systems,
improving communication lives and social integration.
Barriers to Roger Adoption:
Despite its benefits, barriers to adoption include increased
size of hearing aids, complexity of set-up, and ease of use.
Product Usage Instructions:
Step 1: Setting Up the Roger System
1. Ensure your hearing aid or cochlear implant is compatible
with the Roger system.
2. Attach the external receivers to your device as
instructed.
Step 2: Pairing the Transmitter and Receiver
1. Turn on the Roger transmitter and receiver.
2. Follow the pairing instructions provided in the user manual
to establish a connection.
Step 3: Adjusting Settings
1. Customize settings such as volume, sensitivity, and noise
reduction based on your preferences.
2. Test the system in various listening environments to optimize
performance.
Step 4: Maintenance
1. Clean the external receivers regularly to ensure proper
functioning.
2. Check for software updates and follow manufacturer
recommendations for maintenance.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):
Q: Is Roger suitable for all types of hearing aids?
A: Roger is designed to be compatible with a wide range of
hearing aids and cochlear implants. However, it’s essential to
check compatibility with your specific device before
purchasing.
Q: How far can the Roger system transmit audio?
A: The transmission range of the Roger system can vary depending
on environmental factors. In general, it can transmit audio
effectively within a typical room or small group setting.
“`
Phonak
. Insight
Roger Unlimited A new era of Roger receivers
Roger is one of the most scientifically validated remote microphones in the
hearing aid industry. With the introduction of Roger Unlimited, we are
simplifying usability and saving valuable time to unlock more meaningful
connections.
Roh M., September 2024
Key highlights
Considerations for practice
· Roger is Phonak’s proprietary digital remote microphone system introduced in 2013, and is one of the most scientifically validated remote microphone systems in the hearing aid industry.
· Roger Unlimited overcomes many perceived barriers for remote microphone use for the clinician and client, simplifying the installation process and creating valuable time for the HCP.
· Building on RogerDirectTM, Phonak is now introducing unlimited receivers
into the Roger microphones, reducing additional hardware and allowing faster
workflows for the HCP.
· Roger technology improves with feedback from HCPs and users, and our
innovations in Roger receivers have pushed the boundaries of connectivity for
greater usability and acceptance of this technology.
· In many cases the EasyGain of RogerDirect does not need to be electro-
acoustically verified each and every time. HCPs should still rely on
verification as well as subjective feedback when troubleshooting Remote
Microphone (RM) systems.
· With greater usability and simplified process, talking about and trialling
Roger has never been easier. With unlimited receivers, users can now share
their Roger microphones with other Phonak hearing aid users with ease.
Introduction
Since its introduction in 2013, RogerTM technology has been a cornerstone in
the hearing aid industry, offering an effective solution for managing
listening situations where the noise is too loud, or when the speech is beyond
a hearing aids’ critical distance (Figure 1).
as well, especially in high noise environments (Thibodeau, 2014; Wolfe et al.,
2015).
Sufficient evidence exists to suggest the benefits of Roger expand beyond
speech intelligibility in noise for various populations (Gaastra et al., 2024;
Zanin et al., 2024; Thibodeau, 2020).
Studies have also shown Phonak remote microphones can also provide benefits in
improved acceptable noise levels (Schafer et al., 2016), reducing listening
effort (Wagener et al., 2018), and improved temporal processing (Smart et al.,
2018).
Figure 1. Graph showing the theoretical limitations of hearing aids in the far
field, as well as in very loud noise. Note the `critical distance’ is
displayed here as a function of noise and distance but this would typically
factor in other variables as well.
Constant innovations in the remote microphone space have allowed greater
benefit to the Hearing Care Professional (HCP) and end user, giving benefits
not only in performance by way of new features but also in ease of use by way
of workflow and saving time.
Is Roger the same as an FM system? Frequency Modulated (FM) systems were the
first remote microphones to market, and indeed dominated the market until the
early 2010’s with the emergence of digital modulation (DM) systems.
Roger uses a 2.4GHz transmission on the ISM (Industry, Science and Medical
band) and therefore is classified as a digital modulation (DM) system.
However, RM technology is the over-arching term that encompasses both FM and
DM, and is the nomenclature cited in literature today.
Phonak Roger is a dedicated transmission system designed for hearing aids and
cochlear implants, and optimized for both usability and performance. It
maintains low latency and power consumption while delivering high-quality
audio. Additionally, Roger ensures secure, tap-proof networks and offers
capabilities for data reception and control, enhancing the overall user
experience.
Benefits of Roger The benefits of Roger systems (consisting of a transmitter
and receiver (typically a hearing aid)) have been well cited in peer-reviewed
and other scientific literature, showing benefits over traditional FM systems
and other DM systems
Qualitative interviews with users of remote microphone systems, support
people, and HCPs, consistently report that RM systems can make a real
difference in their communication lives, as well as allow for better social
integration (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010; Scarinci et al., 2022).
Barriers to Roger adoption Even though the benefits of Roger are well known,
there are still barriers to adoption of RM systems overall. Some of these
include: increased hearing aid size due to external receivers, complexity of
ordering and set-up by the clinician (e.g., determining receiver
compatibility, physically attaching the external receivers, etc), and ease of
use (Fabry et al., 2007; Fitzpatrick et al., 2010).
Qualitative interviews with users and HCPs cite that remote microphone systems
can seem too complicated, and that ongoing training and support is needed for
both the user and HCP alike. Difficulties around awareness of the devices in
the first place, as well as the need for proper use has also been noted
(Scarinci et al., 2022).
It is clear that there is a need to make RM systems a simpler device for
everybody to use. Our latest advancements in Roger receivers have introduced
two significant innovations that have already begun–and will persist
in–streamlining the Roger experience for both HCPs and end users.
2019: RogerDirectTM
In 2019, Phonak introduced RogerDirect. This technology allows a direct
connection to a Roger microphone without the need for an external receiver,
aiming to create a more cosmetically appealing solution, whilst at the same
time to improve usability of Roger technology and the benefits it provides
above and beyond other RMs.
Phonak Insight. Roger Unlimited a new era of Roger receivers 2
This marvellous innovation resulted in a hearing device that was up to 42% smaller, with 64% reduced current drain, whilst maintaining full Roger compatibility. Knowing that there are cosmetic barriers to Roger adoption (Fitzpatrick et al., 2010), RogerDirect brought an industry-first by allowing a more discrete solution with Roger functionality (Figure 2).
· Removes the need to uninstall or worry about lost receivers a new receiver
can be retrieved from the transmitter for an unlimited number of times.
· Removes the worry about whether a hearing aid contains a 02 or 03 receiver.
· Users can now share their Roger transmitter with other hearing aid users
with RogerDirect.
The removal of additional hardware should simplify the receiver installation process for the HCP and thereby give additional time to focus their efforts on the user.
Figure 2. Image showing an Audéo M-312 overlayed on an Audéo B-13 with Roger
18 design-integrated receiver.
Furthermore, RogerDirect results in less complexity around ordering and set-
up, enabling greater ease of use for both HCPs and users.
Field studies have indeed demonstrated specific advantages in terms of
installation time: the introduction of RogerDirect has resulted in a 27%
reduction in installation time compared to using an external receiver.
Furthermore, 81% of participants rated the installation process to be easier
than when using external receivers (Gordon & Crowhen 2020).
To test this hypothesis, a total of 56 participants were asked to participate
at a Roger booth during an internal international event. Participants
consisted of a mixture of audiologists and non-audiologists, with some having
no prior experience with the Roger Touchscreen Mic, and none having prior
experience with the new process.
Participants were provided with a Phonak Roger Touchscreen Mic 3 and a Phonak
Audéo hearing aid, both of which were switched on. They were instructed to
complete a single Roger receiver installation as quickly as possible. Step-by-
step instructions were provided with time allowed to read prior to the task.
Participants were timed beginning to end.
The median time taken to install one Roger receiver was 9.85 seconds, with all
participants completing the installation process in less than 20 seconds
(Figure 3).
2024: Roger Unlimited
The removal of additional hardware has been a long-time ask from HCPs, especially those working with the Roger for Education portfolio. This was partially addressed with the introduction of RogerDirect and the removal of audio shoes and intermediary devices for Phonak hearing aids.
With the latest innovation in the Roger space, we have now furthered the transition of removing external receivers, by introducing unlimited Roger 02 receivers inside our main Roger transmitters.
Roger Unlimited brings several advantages to the HCP and other professionals
working with Roger:
· Removes any additional hardware required for Roger connections in hearing
aids with RogerDirect.
· Reduces the time taken to install and connect Roger and hearing devices.
Figure 3. Box-and-whisker graph showing time taken (seconds) to install a
Roger receiver from Roger Touchscreen Mic 3 to an Audéo hearing aid using
RogerDirect (N=56).
This new installation process also automatically connects the hearing aid to
the transmitter, thereby saving the additional step of connecting after
installing. Therefore,
Phonak Insight. Roger Unlimited a new era of Roger receivers 3
including conservative time estimates to turn on the Touchscreen Mic and hearing aids, the median time to install a binaural set of Roger receivers into a pair of hearing aids would be estimated at 46.7 seconds.
While this process is not mandatory in many countries, some countries mandate the verification of such devices prior to use, especially in children where subjective checks may not be reliable or able to be completed.
Up until now, HCPs who use a Roger Touchscreen Mic were required to install
Roger receivers via the Roger X and Roger Installer and then pair the
microphone to the hearing aids. Gordon & Crowhen (2020) estimated this median
time to be approximately 1 minute and 20 seconds. Compared to this estimate,
these results suggest the new method could potentially reduce installation &
connection time by up to 51.6%.
Subjective ratings on the ease of installation for this new process was
obtained from 16 of the 56 participants that took part by completing a
feedback form, with the results shown below (Figure 4).
Rating of ease of use
Previous studies comparing a variety of Roger transmitters and external
receiver combinations have shown that there can be variations of this
transparency measure, and therefore would require verification each time (Qi &
Thibodeau, 2022).
With the introduction of digital receivers and the removal of physical
attachments, this impedance mismatch has been removed in theory, and thus the
verification of RogerDirect devices may not be required each and every time
for this purpose.
To confirm this assumption, test box measurements were done on various Roger
transmitters and hearing devices with RogerDirect, across a variety of
audiograms.
Roger Unlimited
0
20
40
60
80 100
Very Easy Easy OK Difficult Very Difficult
Figure 4. Bar graph showing rating of ease of use for Roger receiver installation process (N=16).
When participants were asked to rate the ease of
installation, 94% of participants rated the process as Very Easy’, with all participants rating the process as
Easy’ or `Very Easy’.
Because transparency is checked across the overall system (i.e. Roger
transmitter and receiver set), it was important to test across a variety of
different hearing aids as well as transmitters. i.e. simulating multiple
audiograms on the same transmitter and receiver combination would not be
representative of multiple RM verification sessions.
Regardless, because different audiograms would generate different output
levels, we were interested to see whether there were significant effects of
audiogram thresholds on variations of transparency, as cited in previous
literature for the universal receivers (Qi & Thibodeau, 2022).
Open field comments highlighted the ease of use with the new process (present
in 8 of 11 comments) as well as comments such as no more installer pad’ and
no more Roger X’.
Verification with RogerDirect
One of the reasons for verification of remote microphone systems is due to
impedance mismatch of receiver hardware being physically attached to the
hearing aid/intermediary device. Verification of RM systems are done by
demonstrating transparency:, that the output of the hearing aid microphones is
equal to the output of the remote microphone. The rationale and process is
outlined in the American Academy of Audiology publication (AAA, 2021), with
specific instructions for Roger transmitters adapted in the Roger Verification
Guide (Phonak, 2021).
The below audiograms were used to simulate various degrees of hearing losses
(HL) that attempt to be ecologically valid in the clinic. These were
configured to monaural losses (lateralisation was randomized) across a variety
of age and gender groups.
· Flat 40dB sensorineural hearing loss (HL1) · Flat 40dB conductive hearing
loss (HL2) · N3 sensorineural hearing loss (HL3) · N4 sensorineural hearing
loss (HL4) · N5 sensorineural hearing loss (HL5) · N6 sensorineural hearing
loss (HL6) · N7 sensorineural hearing loss (HL7) · Rising moderate to mild
sensorineural hearing loss
(HL8)
Hearing devices (HD) across a variety of form factors and power levels were
selected, based on the audiogram provided:
· Phonak Sky L90-M (HD1)
Phonak Insight. Roger Unlimited a new era of Roger receivers 4
· Phonak Naída L90-PR (HD2) · Phonak Sky L90-SP (HD3) · Phonak Naída L90-UP (HD4) · Advanced Bionics Naída CI M90 (HD5) · Advanced Bionics Sky CI M90 (HD6)
The following remote microphones (RM) were used: · Roger On V2 (RM1) · Roger Touchscreen Mic (RM2) · Roger Touchscreen Mic 3 (RM3)
The Phonak Offset Protocol (POP) was used, with verification measures performed on a single Verifit 2 test box with a HA4 ear mould substitutes coupled to a 0.4cc wideband coupler. All fittings were occluded in the hearing aid software, to avoid the direct sound compensation that is prescribed for streaming programmes with an open fitting. To simulate inter-subject variation, hearing aids were run through the test box individually for each remote microphone measurement.
Verification of Roger for cochlear implants were done using the protocol described in literature (Schafer et al., 2013).
A total of 45 HD/RM/HL combinations were verified. The results are summarised below:
HD1 HD2 HD3 HD4 HD5 HD6
RM1
0/3 0/4 0/4 0/2 0/1 0/1
RM2
0/3 0/4 0/4 0/2 0/1 0/1
RM3
0/3 0/4 0/4 0/2 0/1 0/1
Sum of HL tested 9 12 12 6 3 3
Total combinations
45
Table 1. Summary of total measurements done. Each number in the table represents different audiograms and whether EasyGain adjustments were required. E.g. 0/3 means 0 of 3 audiogram combinations required EasyGain adjustment.
Table 1 results show that EasyGain adjustments were not required for any of the hearing losses simulated in this experiment (average offset = 1.11dB). This is in line with the theoretical assumption that the impedance mismatch is the typical cause of having to do EasyGain adjustments, and that this effectively removed with RogerDirect, both for hearing aids and cochlear implants.
There was no effect of the hearing loss on the degree of transparency offset seen, though most of the offset was in
one direction (meaning RM response tended to be louder compared to the hearing aid mic response) (Table 2).
Audiogram (HL)
Average offset (dB)
Sample size
HL1
-1.3
6
HL2
-1.7
6
HL3
-1.5
6
HL4
-1.1
6
HL5
-0.9
6
HL6
-1.1
3
HL7
-0.1
3
HL8
-1
3
Table 2. Sub-analyses of recordings to assess effects of Hearing Loss on the
offset of transparency.
This is not an exhaustive list of all audiogram configurations and some open fittings and atypical audiograms may not conform to these findings. However the results of this small investigation suggest that there is no significant impedance mismatch when Roger receivers are digitally installed into RogerDirect hearing devices, across a large variety of audiograms. Thus there is no need to routinely check transparency for impedance mismatch in RM systems.
Regardless, transparency still remains an important aspect of remote microphone testing and can be done to monitor sensitivity of the remote microphones over time. Furthermore, HCPs should always validate the effectiveness of remote microphone systems with behavioral measures to ensure benefit of the RM is being achieved (AAA, 2021).
There is still a need for development of other electroacoustical protocols that can demonstrate RM performance. Such measures would allow HCPs to objectively see the advantage RM systems can provide in noise, rather than simply checking for transparency in quiet. These protocols would ideally encompass both speech in distance and speech in noise measures, and be compatible across various devices including cochlear implants and bone- anchored hearing devices. Examples of such work can be seen in Salehi et al. (2018) & Hussedt et al (2022).
Conclusion
Remote microphones, in particular Roger, complement the benefits of hearing
aids to give additional benefits in noise and distance.
The assumptions of difficulty using the product and complexity when installing
the product is now removed with unlimited digital Roger receivers. By removing
additional hardware, this helps to reduce time spent on installations and
simplifies usability with Roger for both the HCP and users.
Phonak Insight. Roger Unlimited a new era of Roger receivers 5
References
AAA (2011). American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Remote
Microphone Hearing Assistance Technologies for Children and Youth from Birth
to 21 Years.
Fabry D, Mulder H, & Dijkstra E (2007). Acceptance of the wireless microphone
as a hearing aid accessory for adults. The Hearing Journal, 60(11), 32-36.
Fitzpatrick EM, Fournier P, Seguin C, Armstrong S, Chenier J, & Schramm D
(2010). Users’ perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear
implants. International Journal of Audiology, 49, 44-53.
Gaastra B, Whyte S, Hankin B, Bulters D, Galea I, & Campbell N (2024). An
assistive listening device improves hearing following aneurysmal subarachnoid
haemorrhage. European Journal of Neurology, 31(5), e16240-.
Gordon C & Crowhen D (2020). Breaking down barriers with RogerDirectTM. Phonak
Field Study News, June 2020.
Husstedt H, Kahl J, Fitschen C, Griepentrog S, Frenz M, Jürgens T, & Tchorz J
(2022). Design and verification of a measurement setup for wireless remote
microphone systems (WRMSs). International Journal of Audiology, 61(1), 3445.
Phonak (2021). Phonak RogerTM Verification Guide: Phonak Offset Protocol (POP)
for Roger (02) receivers, May 2021.
Qi S & Thibodeau L (2022). Verification of EasyGain Settings in the Roger
Remote Microphone System. American Journal of Audiology, 32(3), 514-525.
Salehi H, Parsa V, & Folkeard P (2018). Electroacoustic Assessment of Wireless
Remote Microphone Systems. Audiology Research, 8(204), 16-23.
Assistive Technology Evaluations: Remote-Microphone Technology for Children
with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Communication Disorders, 64, 1-17.
Smart JL, Purdy SC, & Kelly AS (2018). Impact of Personal Frequency Modulation
Systems on Behavioral and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential Measures of
Auditory Processing and Classroom Listening in School-Aged Children with
Auditory Processing Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,
29(7), 568-586.
Thibodeau LM (2014). Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital
and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use
hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(2), 201210.
Thibodeau LM (2020). Benefits in speech recognition in noise with remote
wireless microphones in group settings. Journal of the American Academy of
Audiology, 31(6), 404411.
Wagener KC, Vormann M, Latzel M, & Mülder HE (2018). Effect of Hearing Aid
Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex
Listening Situations. Trends in Hearing, 22, 1-12.
Wolfe J, Duke MM, Schafer E, Jones C, Mülder HE, John A, & Hudson M (2015).
Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System
and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System. Journal of
the American Academy of Audiology, 24(3), 440450.
Zanin J, Vaisberg J, Swann S, & Rance G (2024). Evaluating benefits of remote
microphone technology for adults with hearing loss using behavioural and
predictive metrics. International Journal of Audiology, 5, 1-9.
Scarinci N, Nickbakht M, Timmer BH, Ekberg K, Cheng B, & Hickson L (2022). A
Qualitative Investigation of Clients, Significant Others, and Clinicians’
Experiences of Using Wireless Microphone Systems to Manage Hearing Impairment.
Audiology Research, 12(6), 596-619.
Schafer EC, Musgrave E, Momin S, Sandrock C, & Romine D (2013). A Proposed
Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal FM Receivers Coupled to Cochlear
Implant Sound Processors. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
24(10). 941954.
Schafer EC, Wright S, Anderson C, Dyson J, Pitts K, Bryant D, Watson M, Box J,
Neve M, Mathews L, & Reed MP (2016).
Author
Min Cheol Roh, MAud
Min obtained his Masters of Audiology at The University of Auckland, New
Zealand in 2017. He has held various roles in diagnostic and rehabilitative
audiology, tertiary education, professional bodies, and in the Sales &
Audiology team at Phonak NZ, before joining as the Audiology Manager for Roger
at Phonak HQ in 2024.
028-2711-02/V1.00/2024-09/sm © 2024 Sonova AG All rights reserved
Phonak Insight. Roger Unlimited a new era of Roger receivers 6
Read User Manual Online (PDF format)
Read User Manual Online (PDF format) >>