Asset Panda Easy Asset Tracking Software User Guide
- May 15, 2024
- Asset Panda
Table of Contents
- Easy Asset Tracking Software
- About The Project
- Constraints:
- process: Problem Definition Refinement
- Process: SECONdary Research
- process: INFformation Architecture
- miele: Sketch Wirefraalos
- Process: Mid-Fi Design
- Process: Final Design Updates
- Process: Design System – Components
- Testing & Feedback
- Read User Manual Online (PDF format)
- Download This Manual (PDF format)
Easy Asset Tracking Software
RE-DESIGN……………….
DESIGN SYSTEM………..
PROTOTYPE……………….
UX AUDIT…………………
Asset panda is an easy asset tracking software that works the way you do.
Meant to be used by a very wide variety of fields ranging from Disney to
schools, users are able to configure field information as they want and add
custom permission to control in minuscule detail who has access fo what.
Users can track online through the App or Mobile App their asset information
anytime.
About The Project
Problem
Current product is deeply complex and was built almost 11 years ago. The
passing of time the product had become too complex to use and their existing
information architecture had become unsustainable.
There had to be a balance between working with tiny tasks and large tasks.
This means that we would need to find a way for users to perform their finy
actions right there on the screen and make sure the larger tasks are easy fo
handle by a wide range of demographics and age.
Soluton
Speed to benefit (time for a client to be onboarded and understand the benefit
from AP) was about 50-60 min they wanted to narrow that to 5-10
minutes.
Constraints:
No deviation from requirements – The client came with a lot of research and
set requirements. They had prepared a large list of yobs to be done from their
current user base, That meant that we could not deviate easily if we thought
that we had found a good solution to a problem.
Their product was very complex and we had to study very carefully their
research and try to bring their vision to life.
This meant less freedom for us to explore beyond these boundaries.
Research:
Competitive research, client data & insights. We did most of the competitive
market research pinpointing strength and weakness and opportunities while the
client provided wealth or user needs and data.
Lack of a style guide – Lacking a style guide for the 2.0 version we had
to come up with something fresh ourselves and try to stay within the current
style boundaries at the same time. Creating a design system would help us make
changes quickly when the client needed to intraduce new colors or other brand
aspects.
Time – The amount of features and sections that needed to be completed was
insane. The app itself had advanced features inside that could well be a
standalone app and usually are, such as forms and automations. Also all of
this needed to be brought in a way to a mobile app.
process: Problem Definition Refinement
Process: SECONdary Research
process: INFformation Architecture
miele: Sketch Wirefraalos
Process: Mid-Fi Design
Process: Final Design Updates
Process: Design System – Components
Testing & Feedback
Allows creation of flat structures. No parent – child
relationships. Allows the users to organize the platform in an unrestricted
structure.
Allows us to link data in a more flexible way.
Decreases the time to configure accounts and bring in data.
“I am encouraged by the expertise of the team, the attention to detail and
just the dynamics of working with us. Promising !!!
Looking forward to a long partnership.”
Ram Shamanna
VP, Product Management & Design